Maybe you're not paying attention, or you're just looking where you want to... Are you saying that this little jab is not political?
His point may be factual, but his monkey business is political. This Monkey business is what our new friend posted first, at the top and up front. His "facts" are secondary, obviously.
Hi Kenny-
Yes, I was looking elsewhere. I zeroed in on SunDevil's first post in this thread:
wait - shouldn't it be "..... teach a man to fish and he will be taxed to provide for the 50% who do not fish."
Which I did not think was political, and was followed by Jerry:
see this is the way a fun thread like this goes to crap...Some Jan Brewer fan (most likely inherited his money) decides to make political points.... American kids are all pretty stupid compared to socialist Europe's kids....just a fact....
Which I thought WAS political.
I think SunDevil stated a researchable fact about who pays what, and Jerry turned it political. (which is cool - I started the thread, and have offered my full blessing to a complete derailment of the original topic)
Sundevil's jab about monkeys certainly did not strengthen his first point about taxes, which could have stood on it's own merit.
The real problem is how many Americans are poor, not how much they pay in taxes.
You and I are in 100% agreement on this point: although I would expand it to include the number of poor people on EARTH, not just the US.
However, It is my opinion that it is nobody's "responsibility" to make poor people more wealthy via government "redistribution", which is merely a fancy term for theft. Remember, Robin Hood was a thief... noble? perhaps, but a thief nonetheless.
I think it is the responsibility of all of us to make sure that everyone gets a fair and honest shot at reaching their greatest personal potential.
The rules of the game should favor no one. But, unfortunately in today's world they DO favor the people that are already the most comfortable... this is wrong in my opinion.