Reviewing scientists find the only study supporting the use of hydroxychlorine for covid 19 does not meet scientific standards. Leaves the effects open to interpretation.
You can review the entire published paper here.
Didier Raoult The paper that appears to have triggered the Trump administration’s obsession with hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for infection with the novel coronavirus has received a statement …
retractionwatch.com
experts are dime a dozen these days. And every day the god-liked worships experts are wrong.
“up to 1.5 Million deaths in US”
“500k deaths in US, based up on our experts in epidemiology and virology”
No, wait, “240k deaths”
Oh sorry, our modeling has changed, “we
predict 100k deaths in US”
“We are happy to announce that our newest datis showing a maximum of 60,000 deaths, with a probable 49k on the low side”. that being said while taking credit for their EXPERT prognostication abilities and NOT taking credit for an absolutely destroyed economy.
Back to the attached article from “experts” regarding hydroxychlorine and Roberto’s mentioning it does not meet scientific standards.
Well, I’ll take this EXPERT and Democratic state representative from Michigan thoughts on the matter :
A Democratic Michigan state lawmaker has credited President Trump's publicizing of the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine with saving her life after her health "plummeted" when she contracted coronavirus.
www.foxnews.com
On a side-note, neither CNN or MSDNC reached out to Rep. Whitsett.
With such a powerful story, I am puzzled why that is ?
Scratching my head.
