Ernesto, if you live in in the Phoenix area I want to take you for an IQ test. I will pay for it.Ever hear the expression Pura Vida? Peace out.
No sir, he is not part of the brotherhood below.Hooch above is from the group down below, and he needs to be house trained. He's smelling up the place.
You're right, and I edited it after doing a little walk down memory lane. Ha, he'd fit right in though.No sir, he is not part of the brotherhood below.
No Politics por favor, per Tyler. You have been warned.Finally a real president with balls not like that sissyboy that destroyed our nation, these corrupt democrats will do anything they can to trash him
Fox News’ Shepard Smith debunks Trump’s migrant caravan rhetoric: ‘There is no invasion’Been pretty quiet around here...well, here we go...
Trump sending 5200 US troops to “harden” the US border, in addition to the 2000 National Guard already deployed. Gonna be a good old-fashioned Mexican stand-off...you know...nobody wins...
The word “invasion” is of course the key here, obviously used by design for a reason we can’t discuss on our forum any longer. It is, in my opinion, an inappropriate word to use as most people will think of definition number 1 when in reality definition number 2 is accurate. Dirty deal in my book.... wait, can I say that??Fox News’ Shepard Smith debunks Trump’s migrant caravan rhetoric: ‘There is no invasion’
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/fox-news-shepard-smith-debunks-trumps-migrant-caravan-rhetoric-there-is-no-invasion-2018-10-29
They are gonna get a free stay at a Trump tent city resort.Just read about the "Irish Invasion" and how the Irish were vilified as subhuman. There have been several "immigrant invasions' and each wave breathed new life into the US economy and society. The new invasionistias ought to get a free weekend at one of you know who's resorts.
Actually you can make the argument that all 3 definitions are accurate in this case.The word “invasion” is of course the key here, obviously used by design for a reason we can’t discuss on our forum any longer. It is, in my opinion, an inappropriate word to use as most people will think of definition number 1 when in reality definition number 2 is accurate. Dirty deal in my book.... wait, can I say that??
in·va·sion
noun
1. an instance of invading a country or region with an armed force.
2. an incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity.
3. an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.
Very true however in an environment of which we are no longer permitted to discuss number one would be considered fear-mongering and I believe that is most people’s perception of the word.Actually you can make the argument that all 3 definitions are accurate in this case.
We can't talk about number 1 anymore? That's a pile of number 2.Very true however in an environment of which we are no longer permitted to discuss number one would be considered fear-mongering and I believe that is most people’s perception of the word.
STFUFor those comparing these modern day invasions to previous Irish and Italian immigrant waves there are a few distinctions.
1) The people were brought in a controlled manner to a designated US location (Ellis Island) where papers and health were checked. Those found to be ill were quarantined, treated and in some cases returned to their home country,
2) none of them were burning the American flag on the way in,
3) none were waving the flag of their home country as they tried to enter the US,
4) all were proud of their new host country and strived to become American,
5) none isolated themselves in to their own areas and demanded their home language become the official US language,
There are a few Dozen more distinct differences between then And now but I’ll stop as I’m not intending to inflame anyone here but just clarify there is a huge difference.
That’s not very friendly.STFU
For those comparing these modern day invasions to previous Irish and Italian immigrant waves there are a few distinctions.
1) The people were brought in a controlled manner to a designated US location (Ellis Island) where papers and health were checked. Those found to be ill were quarantined, treated and in some cases returned to their home country,
2) none of them were burning the American flag on the way in,
3) none were waving the flag of their home country as they tried to enter the US,
4) all were proud of their new host country and strived to become American,
5) none isolated themselves in to their own areas and demanded their home language become the official US language,
There are a few Dozen more distinct differences between then And now but I’ll stop as I’m not intending to inflame anyone here but just clarify there is a huge difference.
That’s enough. I’m not trying to stir any trouble. I’ll discuss what I listed unless you wish to make another point. Peacefully of course.Your distinctions are fascinating. Please share more. Thank you.