Obviously, the trailer style is not for you..No Thanks..
Wow, did I read this right? In Las Palomas it is over $500 a month to lend your condo to a guest?? Is this above and beyond the HOA fees? Do other condos in Rocky Point charge you to use your own condo when you are not renting?I think the $500 listing is bogus (all rentals have to go through the resorts management company, fees alone for a "guest of owner" would be over $500 for the month- thus the owner would be renting for free.)
I own at Las Palomas- rentals are better this year than in 2009, numbers are close to 2008 figures.
Wow, did I read this right? In Las Palomas it is over $500 a month to lend your condo to a guest?? Is this above and beyond the HOA fees? Do other condos in Rocky Point charge you to use your own condo when you are not renting?
Would anyone buy into a resort with this policy?
I understand, but you can't be happy that you may be paying three or four times as much each year to have that preference. And, if things get any worse down there, you may even lose your ownership. I had a friend who built a house further down in Mexico on a beachfront lot. He had about $500K invested over five years with the idea of living there when he retired. The government seized it from him.I prefer to be able to walk 30 feet and be on the beach and see it outside my window.
Is it really a fact that owners who LEND to guests are charged a guest of owner fee at Las Palomas? According to the previous poster, he says it is over $500 a month. I would be upset with paying $1 to lend my condo to a guest, but $500....Wow!The owner pays the HOA fees every month if it is a rental or not. The condo management/HOA requires a MINIMUM rental fee and you have to charge that, plus there are numerous other fees charged to the renter, even if they are a friend/relative of the owner. They would never let a condo owner rent a unit for $500 a month. The MINIMUM mandatory rental fee at Las Palomas is more that $500 a week for the smallest condo! The problem is that you can find a condo for rent cheaper, but you are still looking at $100 a night at most 2bd 2bath condos. If you go on Craig's list, you will see 99% of the ads for condos are for Las Palomas because their HOA forces them to charge more than the other condo developments.
I'm sure the Las Palomas owners who bought a unit to rent out are very, very unhappy right now.
Hey...we ought to march on the capital demanding that you can live there without learning the language!!! You have rights!!!:stir::rofl:I think I'd rather be hit in the head with a 2x4 loaded with rusty nails than own one of those over-priced condos and have to deal with exhorbitant HOA fees. I purposely picked my home in Gilbert because it was sans HOA (only 14 neighborhoods are).
Why not rent this cute home in Moorea, only $1236/mo
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sl=fr&tl=en&u=http://www.degout.pf/detail.php?1224&rurl=translate.google.com&twu=1&usg=ALkJrhgJUBBiVX9FZkAOBgl7dx6hjezUrw#
That's where I'll be retiring to if I can learn enough french that they let me stay.
Where and what were the circumstances?I understand, but you can't be happy that you may be paying three or four times as much each year to have that preference. And, if things get any worse down there, you may even lose your ownership. I had a friend who built a house further down in Mexico on a beachfront lot. He had about $500K invested over five years with the idea of living there when he retired. The government seized it from him.
I predict that you would have been so much better off buying in San Diego in the long run.
Not really sure, but hubby knows. He's out of town today, so I'll post when I find out. It was along the Baja coast I think. He lost everything!Where and what were the circumstances?
Yup. Remember it well. If I'm not mistaken, he brought in a tractor/bulldozer and completely razed the buildings before he left, rather than just hand his many years of work and money over to the Mexicans.La Bufadora (south of Ensenada
It was at least ten years ago. My friend and his wife lived in Santa Clara, Ca. They would drive down every couple of months and add some furniture or appliances. It was a three story house with state-of-the-art everything. They took every extra penny they had and put it in the house. The worst part was that it took so long for the problem to arise. You would think after a certain number of years you could feel safe with your land.I remember hearing about that. I believe there was a big write up about it on the old forum. A little internet research should tell ya the story.
I remember the case but I thought you were referring to a current situation. This type of situation has happened up and down the Baja and Sonora coast also, but often with equitable resolution.It was at least ten years ago. My friend and his wife lived in Santa Clara, Ca. They would drive down every couple of months and add some furniture or appliances. It was a three story house with state-of-the-art everything. They took every extra penny they had and put it in the house. The worst part was that it took so long for the problem to arise. You would think after a certain number of years you could feel safe with your land.
I'll take the RV parks any day over buying a condo down there.